In September 2024, the UK government released a position paper outlining its stance on the EU’s upcoming Research and Innovation Framework Programme (FP10). This document highlights the UK’s commitment to ongoing collaboration with the EU, focusing on key priorities such as research excellence, global collaboration, security, and the need for reduced administrative burdens. While highlighting the potential benefits of such cooperation, the paper also details the UK’s desire for fair financial contributions and security considerations, setting the stage for future negotiations between the UK and the EU.

Background: The UK’s History with EU Research Frameworks
Before delving into the specifics of the UK’s current position, it is essential to understand the history between the UK and the EU in the context of research and innovation collaboration. The EU’s Research and Innovation Framework Programmes, which date back to the 1980s, have always been integral to fostering collaborative research across Europe. Horizon 2020, the predecessor of Horizon Europe, saw the UK as one of the largest beneficiaries and contributors. UK researchers, universities, and businesses often ranked among the top recipients of EU research funding, which allowed them to lead cutting-edge projects and contribute to critical scientific advancements.

However, the UK’s decision to leave the EU in 2016 posed significant uncertainties about its future participation in these programs. The post-Brexit Trade and Cooperation Agreement provided a pathway for UK association with Horizon Europe, but the exact terms and conditions were subject to negotiations. The document under review highlights the UK’s aspirations to maintain a productive relationship with the EU in the realm of research and innovation, ensuring that Brexit does not lead to scientific isolation.

  1. Core Objectives of the UK’s Position
    The UK government’s primary objective in its position on the EU’s Research and Innovation Framework Programme is to maintain access to cutting-edge research and innovation networks while safeguarding its own national interests. To achieve this, the document outlines several key goals:
    1. Promoting Excellence in Research: The UK emphasises the need for continued participation in programs that prioritise research excellence. The country’s world-leading universities and research institutions have long been central to Europe’s research landscape, and the UK aims to retain this role through FP10 (Framework Programme 10). The government stresses that research excellence should remain a cornerstone of EU research programs to ensure that the best minds and institutions can collaborate on solving global challenges.
    2. Global Openness and Collaboration: The UK seeks to promote global openness in research. While Europe remains a critical partner, the UK also aspires to expand its research networks to include other countries like the United States, Japan, and Canada. The document advocates for a framework that allows non-EU countries to contribute to and benefit from EU research programs, creating a truly global research ecosystem.
    3. Addressing Global Challenges: Tackling issues such as climate change, public health (e.g., pandemic preparedness), and digital transformation are key priorities for the UK. The EU’s Horizon Europe initiative is already aligned with these objectives, and the UK government stresses the importance of continuing to address these global challenges in partnership with the EU and beyond. The position paper highlights that research aimed at solving cross-border problems will be most effective when countries collaborate across geographical boundaries.
    4. Security in Research: Given the geopolitical landscape and the increasing importance of data and technology security, the UK insists that any association with EU research programs must consider security issues. This includes protecting sensitive research data, intellectual property, and ensuring that the UK’s national security interests are upheld. The government seeks a balance between open scientific collaboration and safeguarding national security concerns, especially in areas like AI, cybersecurity, and quantum computing.
    5. Reducing Administrative Burdens: One of the UK’s criticisms of the EU research framework has been its administrative complexity. The UK government advocates for a more streamlined and efficient system that encourages participation from researchers, especially from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). A reduction in bureaucratic red tape would enable smoother collaboration and a more dynamic research environment.
    6. Ensuring Value for Money: Post-Brexit, the UK has faced pressure to demonstrate that any financial contributions to EU research programs deliver tangible benefits for its economy and society. The document emphasises that the UK’s participation in FP10 should be based on a fair contribution model where the benefits to the UK are commensurate with its investment. This is crucial in ensuring public support for continued participation in EU initiatives.

Opportunities and Challenges of UK-EU Research Collaboration
The UK’s position on associating with the EU’s Framework Programme reflects both opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, continued collaboration offers substantial benefits. Horizon Europe provides access to some of the world’s most advanced research infrastructures, databases, and networks. UK scientists, universities, and companies would have the opportunity to collaborate with their EU counterparts on groundbreaking projects that are too large or complex to be undertaken by one country alone.

On the other hand, the relationship is not without challenges. The Brexit process has introduced uncertainties around the legal, financial, and operational frameworks governing UK participation in EU programs. There is also the potential for political friction, especially if either side perceives that the terms of collaboration are not mutually beneficial. The UK government, in its position paper, acknowledges these challenges but maintains that constructive negotiations can overcome them.

The Potential Impact on the UK’s Research Ecosystem
Should the UK secure a favourable association agreement with the EU’s Research and Innovation Framework Programme, it stands to benefit in several ways. First and foremost, UK researchers will continue to have access to the EU’s vast research networks and funding opportunities. This would be particularly advantageous for fields such as biomedical research, climate science, and artificial intelligence, where collaboration across borders accelerates innovation.

Moreover, the UK’s commitment to global openness means that the country can continue to foster relationships with non-EU partners while benefiting from its proximity to Europe. This dual approach could strengthen the UK’s position as a global research hub, attracting top talent and investment from around the world.
However, if the UK fails to secure an agreement or chooses not to participate, the consequences could be significant. UK institutions would lose access to EU funding and collaborative networks, potentially putting them at a disadvantage compared to their European counterparts. This could lead to a “brain drain,” with top researchers opting to work in countries with better funding opportunities. Furthermore, the UK’s research output could suffer if it becomes more difficult to participate in large-scale, multinational research projects.

Navigating the Future of UK-EU Research Relations
The UK’s position on the EU’s Research and Innovation Framework Programme reflects a desire for continued collaboration in a post-Brexit world. By prioritising research excellence, global openness, and a fair financial contribution, the UK aims to remain a central player in European and global research networks. The government’s stance highlights the need to balance national interests with the benefits of international cooperation, particularly in tackling global challenges that require collective action.

Moving forward, the success of UK-EU research relations will depend on constructive negotiations that address both the opportunities and challenges of collaboration. If managed effectively, the UK could emerge as a stronger, more globally connected research leader, leveraging its relationships with both the EU and the wider world to drive scientific and technological innovation.

For detailed information on the UK’s position, you can access the full document here.