Proposal preparation grants for 2024 and 2025 calls

Innovate UK and the British Academy have funding schemes open for Horizon Europe Pump Priming Grants, to enable SMEs, research organisations and universities in the UK build partnerships and develop proposals. If you are planning a submission to a 2024 or 2025 Horizon Europe call, one of these schemes may support the development of your proposal.

Innovate UK Horizon Europe Pump Priming
UK SMEs can apply for a grant of up to £5000 (Ex-VAT) to help them in their preparation for submitting a Horizon Europe proposal for a collaborative opportunity. This could be used to fund attendance at networking events, to contribute to the cost of joining associations and other activities that are solely directed at future Horizon Europe participation. Note that if you have already received an Innovate UK Pump Priming grant you will not be able to apply for another in this round. The closing date for applications is 17th January 2025 and the final date on which claims can be made for payment is 17th February 2025.

British Academy Horizon Europe Pump Priming
Principal Investigators (PIs) at universities and research institutions can apply for a grant of up to £10,000 to help them in their preparations for submitting a Horizon Europe proposal for Pillar 2 of Horizon Europe – Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness. All of the details such as eligibility, closing dates, etc., are published on the British Academy website and any questions about this scheme should be addressed directly to them.

by Dayne Hodgson

EU and Japan Enter Negotiations for Horizon Europe Association

On 29th November 2024, the European Union (EU) and Japan commenced formal negotiations to integrate Japan into Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research and innovation programme. This move represents a significant step forward in deepening international scientific collaboration and highlights the global importance of cooperative research in tackling shared challenges. By exploring Japan's association with Horizon Europe, both parties aim to create a mutually beneficial framework for advancing scientific excellence and innovation.

What is Horizon Europe?
Horizon Europe is the EU's most ambitious research and innovation programme to date, with a budget exceeding €95.5 billion for 2021–2027. It succeeds Horizon 2020 and is structured around three key pillars:

  1. Excellent Science: Supporting top-tier researchers and frontier science through grants and scholarships.
  2. Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness: Tackling pressing global issues such as climate change, health, and digital transformation.
  3. Innovative Europe: Boosting Europe's innovation potential by bridging the gap between research and market-ready products or solutions.

As the cornerstone of the EU's research agenda, Horizon Europe facilitates cross-border collaboration, driving breakthroughs that are often unattainable through isolated efforts.

The Context of EU-Japan Cooperation
Japan and the EU share a longstanding history of collaboration in science and technology. This relationship is built on mutual respect and a shared vision of addressing global challenges through innovative solutions. Over the years, their partnership has flourished in areas such as climate action, health sciences, renewable energy, and digital technologies.

Under Horizon 2020, the EU's previous research framework, Japanese organisations actively participated in 176 projects, contributing their expertise to collaborative research efforts. This history sets a strong precedent for Japan's potential association with Horizon Europe.

Why is This Association Significant?
The negotiations are focused on Japan's association with Pillar II of Horizon Europe, which is dedicated to addressing global challenges. By joining this pillar, Japanese researchers and institutions will have the opportunity to:

  • Participate in multinational research consortia.
  • Lead and coordinate joint projects with EU partners.
  • Access funding and resources from the Horizon Europe programme.

This agreement would enable Japan to contribute directly to large-scale, multidisciplinary research initiatives designed to tackle issues like climate change, health crises, digital innovation, and sustainable development.

A Strategic Milestone for Japan and the EU
The association negotiations align with broader strategic objectives for both Japan and the EU.

  • For the EU: This move reinforces its commitment to fostering global partnerships in research and innovation, ensuring that Europe remains a hub for scientific excellence. By collaborating with leading global innovators like Japan, the EU strengthens its position in tackling complex global challenges.
  • For Japan: Associating with Horizon Europe provides Japanese researchers with access to one of the world's most prestigious and well-funded research platforms. It also allows Japan to integrate more deeply into global research networks, expanding its influence and leveraging international expertise.

Shared Goals: Addressing the Green and Digital Transitions
Iliana Ivanova, the European Commissioner for Innovation, Research, Culture, Education, and Youth, highlighted the importance of this collaboration:

"The opening of the negotiations on the association of Japan to Horizon Europe marks a step change in our cooperation. For both EU and Japan, research and innovation are key to ensuring competitiveness and achieving the green and digital transitions. Together, we will be able to reach them faster and find solutions to the world’s most pressing challenges."

The green transition involves achieving carbon neutrality by mid-century, a goal shared by both Japan and the EU. Collaborative projects in renewable energy, carbon capture, sustainable agriculture, and electric mobility are expected to play a pivotal role in reaching these objectives.

Similarly, the digital transition focuses on advancing artificial intelligence, data science, and cybersecurity. By pooling resources and expertise, Japan and the EU aim to lead in setting global standards for emerging technologies.

What Does Japan Stand to Gain?
Japan's association with Horizon Europe presents numerous advantages:

  1. Increased Collaboration: Japanese institutions will have greater opportunities to collaborate with European universities, research centres, and industries.
  2. Access to Funding: Japanese researchers can directly benefit from Horizon Europe's substantial financial resources, enabling them to pursue ambitious projects.
  3. Global Influence: Participating in EU-led initiatives enhances Japan’s visibility and influence in the global scientific community.
  4. Innovation Boost: Exposure to diverse perspectives and cutting-edge research can catalyse innovation within Japan's domestic research ecosystem.

Challenges and Considerations
While the potential benefits are substantial, several challenges must be addressed during the negotiation process:

  • Funding Mechanisms: Determining how Japanese contributions will align with Horizon Europe's funding model.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Ensuring that Japan’s research policies and intellectual property laws are compatible with EU standards.
  • Administrative Barriers: Streamlining the integration process to facilitate seamless collaboration between Japanese and European researchers.

These challenges highlight the need for careful planning and mutual understanding to make the association successful.

Building a Global Research Ecosystem
The EU's Horizon Europe programme has already established partnerships with other non-EU countries, including Canada, New Zealand, and South Korea. These associations demonstrate the EU’s commitment to fostering a global research ecosystem that transcends geographical boundaries. Japan's inclusion in this network would not only strengthen bilateral ties but also contribute to a more interconnected and collaborative global scientific community.

by Dayne Hodgson

Autumn Budget: Record £20.4bn R&D investment

In the 2024 Autumn Budget, the UK government announced a landmark investment of £20.4 billion into research and development (R&D) to boost economic growth, tackle national challenges, and establish the UK as a global leader in innovation. This substantial funding demonstrates a commitment to addressing critical areas like healthcare, sustainable energy, digital infrastructure, and technological advancements, aiming to achieve the UK’s “five national missions.” Here’s an overview of the key allocations and expected impacts.

Horizon Europe and Core R&D Budget

A significant portion of the budget secures the UK's full participation in Horizon Europe, the EU's primary research and innovation program. By committing to this association, UK scientists and innovators gain access to an €95 billion fund for collaborative projects, positioning the UK at the heart of global scientific advancements. Additionally, the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology (DSIT) received a budget increase to £13.9 billion, while core research funding rose to a record £6.1 billion. These increases aim to bolster the UK’s research base and foster innovation across various sectors.

Life Sciences Innovative Manufacturing Fund

The government unveiled a £520 million Life Sciences Innovative Manufacturing Fund (LSIMF) to enhance the UK's capacity for manufacturing critical medical supplies. Starting with an initial £70 million in grants, the LSIMF is expected to unlock up to £1.8 billion in private investment, creating thousands of high-skilled jobs and supporting the healthcare sector’s resilience. This fund aims to strengthen the NHS by ensuring quicker access to innovative treatments, contributing to the UK’s preparedness for future health emergencies.

R&D Missions Programme

A new R&D Missions Programme will initially receive £25 million to address specific national challenges, such as healthcare advancements and clean energy transition. This initiative will foster partnerships with private and third-sector organisations to convert scientific discoveries into practical solutions, enhancing the quality of life and driving forward the UK’s sustainability goals.

Proof of Concept Fund for University Spinouts

To foster innovation from UK universities, the government is investing £40 million over five years in a Proof of Concept Fund. This fund will help researchers transform breakthrough ideas into viable businesses, creating job opportunities and stimulating economic growth. Success stories like Pragmatic Semiconductor and Oxford Nanopore underscore the potential of university spinouts to drive growth, with both companies raising significant investment and creating high-skilled employment in critical sectors.

Innovation Accelerators and Made Smarter Innovation Programs

The budget extends funding for Innovation Accelerators, supporting regional innovation in areas like Glasgow, Greater Manchester, and the West Midlands. These accelerators focus on developing high-potential local industries, with projects like Chemify and the Biochar Cleantech Accelerator attracting millions in private investment. Additionally, the Made Smarter Innovation program will receive £37 million to encourage manufacturers to integrate digital technologies, enhancing productivity and sustainability across UK industries.

Project Gigabit and Shared Rural Network

To improve connectivity, the government will invest £500 million in Project Gigabit and the Shared Rural Network. This funding supports the expansion of high-speed digital infrastructure to underserved regions, with the goal of achieving full gigabit coverage by 2030. Reliable internet access is crucial for businesses and communities across the UK, ensuring equal access to digital resources and fostering regional economic development.

Shared Services Strategy

An £80 million allocation will modernise shared services across nine government departments, streamlining operations for greater efficiency. By updating these systems, the government aims to cut costs and improve services, providing better value for taxpayers.

Barriers to Transformative Technology Adoption

To identify obstacles in adopting transformative technologies, a review led by Chief Scientific Adviser Professor Dame Angela McLean and National Technology Adviser Dr. Dave Smith will assess high-growth sectors. This review seeks to enhance productivity and drive innovation in alignment with the government’s Industrial Strategy, ensuring the UK remains competitive in emerging tech fields.

Reaction from the Scientific Community

This record R&D investment has been met with widespread approval from the scientific community. Royal Society President Sir Adrian Smith commended the government’s recognition of research as a “crucial national asset,” emphasising that protecting the science budget is essential for long-term economic growth. He noted the importance of supporting net-zero initiatives and promoting innovation in sectors like AI to maximise the economic benefits of scientific advancements.

by Dayne Hodgson

UK’s position on the EU's Research and Innovation Framework Programme

In September 2024, the UK government released a position paper outlining its stance on the EU's upcoming Research and Innovation Framework Programme (FP10). This document highlights the UK's commitment to ongoing collaboration with the EU, focusing on key priorities such as research excellence, global collaboration, security, and the need for reduced administrative burdens. While highlighting the potential benefits of such cooperation, the paper also details the UK’s desire for fair financial contributions and security considerations, setting the stage for future negotiations between the UK and the EU.

Background: The UK's History with EU Research Frameworks
Before delving into the specifics of the UK’s current position, it is essential to understand the history between the UK and the EU in the context of research and innovation collaboration. The EU’s Research and Innovation Framework Programmes, which date back to the 1980s, have always been integral to fostering collaborative research across Europe. Horizon 2020, the predecessor of Horizon Europe, saw the UK as one of the largest beneficiaries and contributors. UK researchers, universities, and businesses often ranked among the top recipients of EU research funding, which allowed them to lead cutting-edge projects and contribute to critical scientific advancements.

However, the UK's decision to leave the EU in 2016 posed significant uncertainties about its future participation in these programs. The post-Brexit Trade and Cooperation Agreement provided a pathway for UK association with Horizon Europe, but the exact terms and conditions were subject to negotiations. The document under review highlights the UK's aspirations to maintain a productive relationship with the EU in the realm of research and innovation, ensuring that Brexit does not lead to scientific isolation.

  1. Core Objectives of the UK’s Position
    The UK government's primary objective in its position on the EU's Research and Innovation Framework Programme is to maintain access to cutting-edge research and innovation networks while safeguarding its own national interests. To achieve this, the document outlines several key goals:
    1. Promoting Excellence in Research: The UK emphasises the need for continued participation in programs that prioritise research excellence. The country’s world-leading universities and research institutions have long been central to Europe's research landscape, and the UK aims to retain this role through FP10 (Framework Programme 10). The government stresses that research excellence should remain a cornerstone of EU research programs to ensure that the best minds and institutions can collaborate on solving global challenges.
    2. Global Openness and Collaboration: The UK seeks to promote global openness in research. While Europe remains a critical partner, the UK also aspires to expand its research networks to include other countries like the United States, Japan, and Canada. The document advocates for a framework that allows non-EU countries to contribute to and benefit from EU research programs, creating a truly global research ecosystem.
    3. Addressing Global Challenges: Tackling issues such as climate change, public health (e.g., pandemic preparedness), and digital transformation are key priorities for the UK. The EU’s Horizon Europe initiative is already aligned with these objectives, and the UK government stresses the importance of continuing to address these global challenges in partnership with the EU and beyond. The position paper highlights that research aimed at solving cross-border problems will be most effective when countries collaborate across geographical boundaries.
    4. Security in Research: Given the geopolitical landscape and the increasing importance of data and technology security, the UK insists that any association with EU research programs must consider security issues. This includes protecting sensitive research data, intellectual property, and ensuring that the UK’s national security interests are upheld. The government seeks a balance between open scientific collaboration and safeguarding national security concerns, especially in areas like AI, cybersecurity, and quantum computing.
    5. Reducing Administrative Burdens: One of the UK's criticisms of the EU research framework has been its administrative complexity. The UK government advocates for a more streamlined and efficient system that encourages participation from researchers, especially from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). A reduction in bureaucratic red tape would enable smoother collaboration and a more dynamic research environment.
    6. Ensuring Value for Money: Post-Brexit, the UK has faced pressure to demonstrate that any financial contributions to EU research programs deliver tangible benefits for its economy and society. The document emphasises that the UK’s participation in FP10 should be based on a fair contribution model where the benefits to the UK are commensurate with its investment. This is crucial in ensuring public support for continued participation in EU initiatives.

Opportunities and Challenges of UK-EU Research Collaboration
The UK’s position on associating with the EU’s Framework Programme reflects both opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, continued collaboration offers substantial benefits. Horizon Europe provides access to some of the world’s most advanced research infrastructures, databases, and networks. UK scientists, universities, and companies would have the opportunity to collaborate with their EU counterparts on groundbreaking projects that are too large or complex to be undertaken by one country alone.

On the other hand, the relationship is not without challenges. The Brexit process has introduced uncertainties around the legal, financial, and operational frameworks governing UK participation in EU programs. There is also the potential for political friction, especially if either side perceives that the terms of collaboration are not mutually beneficial. The UK government, in its position paper, acknowledges these challenges but maintains that constructive negotiations can overcome them.

The Potential Impact on the UK’s Research Ecosystem
Should the UK secure a favourable association agreement with the EU's Research and Innovation Framework Programme, it stands to benefit in several ways. First and foremost, UK researchers will continue to have access to the EU’s vast research networks and funding opportunities. This would be particularly advantageous for fields such as biomedical research, climate science, and artificial intelligence, where collaboration across borders accelerates innovation.

Moreover, the UK’s commitment to global openness means that the country can continue to foster relationships with non-EU partners while benefiting from its proximity to Europe. This dual approach could strengthen the UK's position as a global research hub, attracting top talent and investment from around the world.
However, if the UK fails to secure an agreement or chooses not to participate, the consequences could be significant. UK institutions would lose access to EU funding and collaborative networks, potentially putting them at a disadvantage compared to their European counterparts. This could lead to a “brain drain,” with top researchers opting to work in countries with better funding opportunities. Furthermore, the UK's research output could suffer if it becomes more difficult to participate in large-scale, multinational research projects.

Navigating the Future of UK-EU Research Relations
The UK’s position on the EU’s Research and Innovation Framework Programme reflects a desire for continued collaboration in a post-Brexit world. By prioritising research excellence, global openness, and a fair financial contribution, the UK aims to remain a central player in European and global research networks. The government's stance highlights the need to balance national interests with the benefits of international cooperation, particularly in tackling global challenges that require collective action.

Moving forward, the success of UK-EU research relations will depend on constructive negotiations that address both the opportunities and challenges of collaboration. If managed effectively, the UK could emerge as a stronger, more globally connected research leader, leveraging its relationships with both the EU and the wider world to drive scientific and technological innovation.

For detailed information on the UK's position, you can access the full document here.

by Dayne Hodgson

EU Research and Innovation Policy: Key Agendas for Autumn 2024

As Autumn 2024 unfolds, the European Union’s (EU) research and innovation (R&I) sector is entering a period of strategic transformation, marked by new appointments, evolving policies, and critical budgetary discussions. The upcoming months promise significant shifts that will define the future of European competitiveness, defence, and research collaboration. Here's a look at the key points on the EU’s R&I agenda.

New Research Commissioner: Expectations and Priorities

One of the most eagerly anticipated events is the appointment of a new research commissioner. This individual, set to be nominated and quizzed by Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in the coming months, will significantly influence the EU’s R&I policies for the foreseeable future. The commissioner’s role will be pivotal in guiding the remaining years of Horizon Europe (the EU’s current research and innovation framework) and laying the groundwork for its successor, Framework Programme 10 (FP10).

There is speculation about whether the research portfolio will remain a standalone entity or be merged into a broader portfolio encompassing competitiveness, internal markets, or the economy. As stakeholders wait for the appointment, many are advocating for R&I to stay at the heart of European policy, ensuring continued focus on innovation as a driver of competitiveness.

Defence and Research: The Role of the European Defence Fund

For the first time, defence research is expected to play a more prominent role in EU R&I policy. Ursula von der Leyen, in her campaign for re-election as European Commission President, highlighted defence as a top priority. This includes bolstering the European Defence Fund (EDF), which is designed to support research and development in defence technologies. While the immediate focus remains on urgent defence needs, especially in light of the ongoing situation in Ukraine, long-term plans are also in motion to enhance European defence capabilities through R&D initiatives.

A Clean Industrial Deal: A Pathway to Green Competitiveness

Von der Leyen’s agenda also includes the introduction of a Clean Industrial Deal, which is set to accelerate green technologies across Europe. The goal is to create lead markets in industries such as clean steel and renewable energy, with a particular emphasis on simplifying processes like planning and permitting for green projects. This initiative is part of a broader strategy aimed at positioning the EU as a global leader in sustainable industrial practices.

Although many of these plans are part of von der Leyen’s long-term vision, the Clean Industrial Deal could be instrumental in driving R&I investments in green technologies, aligning the EU’s competitiveness with its environmental goals. This initiative ties in with the broader objectives of Horizon Europe and its successor program, which continue to prioritise sustainability across R&I projects.

FP10: Shaping the Future of European Research

One of the most significant discussions in the R&I community centres around FP10, the next iteration of the EU’s flagship research funding program. An expert group has been convened to assess Horizon Europe’s progress and provide recommendations for FP10. This group, led by former Portuguese research minister Manuel Heitor, is set to deliver its findings in mid-October 2024.

FP10 will likely build on the collaborative research strengths of Horizon Europe, which has been critical in fostering partnerships across Europe. The focus is expected to remain on global challenges, such as climate change, health, and digital transformation, while also incorporating new priorities around defence and industrial competitiveness.

Challenges Ahead: Budget and Policy Debates

While the R&I community welcomes the strategic goals outlined by von der Leyen, several challenges lie ahead. One of the most contentious issues is the budget for Horizon Europe. The European Council has proposed cuts of €400 million to the program for 2025, a move that has been met with resistance from the European Parliament and the research community.

These budgetary discussions are particularly significant as the EU prepares for the next long-term budget cycle, beginning in 2028. Many are concerned that R&I funding could be reduced in favour of other priorities, such as the proposed European Competitiveness Fund. Stakeholders are advocating for a balanced approach that maintains strong support for R&I while addressing Europe’s broader economic and defence needs.

The Role of Competitiveness in Shaping R&I

Competitiveness is at the core of von der Leyen’s policy agenda. In addition to defence and green technologies, she has emphasised the need for Europe to remain competitive on the global stage. This includes fostering innovation through R&I investments, particularly in high-tech sectors like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and biotechnology.

A key component of this strategy is the forthcoming report by former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi, which is expected to provide a roadmap for boosting EU competitiveness. While the report’s release has been delayed, its findings are anticipated to shape much of the EU’s R&I policy going forward.

by Dayne Hodgson

Innovate UK Women in Innovation Programme Outrage

The recent Innovate UK Women in Innovation outcome has drawn significant attention, particularly after Innovate UK's failure to deliver on its funding promises for women-led projects. The initiative, which began in 2016, aims to foster female entrepreneurship by offering financial support and mentorship. However, the most recent round of awards has been mired in controversy, as only 25 applicants were going to receive funding instead of the promised 50, sparking backlash and concerns about Innovate UK's commitment to gender equality.

Women in Innovation Background

Women in Innovation was designed to address the gender disparity in the UK's innovation sector, aiming to support women entrepreneurs and innovators with financial resources and expert mentorship. It has played a crucial role in fostering female participation in a traditionally male-dominated field. Innovate UK has been credited with increasing the representation of women innovators, noting that successful grant applications from women have risen from 1 in 7 in 2016 to 1 in 3 in recent years.

The program’s focus on creating opportunities for women to grow and scale their businesses has been widely welcomed. However, in the 2024 iteration of the program, the initiative drew significant criticism when Innovate UK announced only 25 of the originally promised 50 projects would receive funding. This decision, seen as a significant misstep, left many applicants feeling unsupported and cast doubt on the future of gender equity in UK innovation. The shortfall in funding not only affected the individual businesses hoping for support, but also raised broader questions about how resources are allocated and the priorities of public funding bodies like Innovate UK.

Innovate UK’s Response and Proposed Measures

This situation prompted Innovate UK to acknowledge their mistake. They admitted that their decision to prioritise fewer projects was wrong and issued a public apology, recognising the negative impact this had on applicants and the larger innovation community. Innovate UK also confirmed that they would fund the remaining 25 projects, thus meeting their original commitment of 50 awards with a total investment of £4 million.

In the face of mounting criticism, Innovate UK has laid out a series of measures aimed at rectifying the situation and ensuring that such mismanagement does not happen again. Their response has been characterised by transparency and an effort to rebuild trust with stakeholders. They have committed to fully funding the 50 projects as originally promised, stating that they are already in the process of contacting the additional 25 successful applicants.

To further demonstrate their commitment to supporting women in innovation, Innovate UK has promised to reach out to all applicants to provide information on additional support and resources available to them. This includes highlighting various services within the broader Innovate UK system, such as the Innovate UK Catapult Network and Business Connect, which are designed to help innovators at different stages of their entrepreneurial journeys.

Innovate UK has also pledged to improve its strategic engagement with business leaders and gender equality advocates to better understand the needs of women innovators and create new opportunities for them. They are working on refining their internal processes and co-creating new programs that will expand the support available to women in innovation.

Rebuilding Trust and Accountability

While Innovate UK’s quick response and admission of fault are positive steps, the scandal has emphasised the importance of accountability in public funding. There is now greater pressure on Innovate UK to ensure that such mistakes are not repeated. By reaffirming their commitment to gender equality and promising to deliver on their initial funding promises, Innovate UK is attempting to restore its credibility within the innovation community.

Moving forward, Innovate UK will need to demonstrate that it has learned from this controversy. Its plan to co-create opportunities with business leaders and advocates, alongside improving transparency and funding processes, is critical to regaining the trust of the community it serves. Gender equality advocates are also calling for increased oversight to ensure that public funds are managed responsibly and that women innovators receive the support they need to succeed.

Broader Implications for Women in Innovation

This scandal (for this author, who has been watching too much Bridgeton) has highlighted the broader challenges that women face in the innovation sector. While initiatives like Women in Innovation are crucial for addressing gender disparities, they must be backed by consistent and reliable support. The Innovate UK funding shortfall serves as a reminder that efforts to close the gender gap in innovation require more than good intentions - they demand effective execution and follow-through.

The fact that applications for this year’s Women in Innovation program reached an all-time high (1,452 applications) is a positive sign that more women are seeking opportunities in the innovation sector. However, with only 50 projects being supported at a maximum grant of £75,000 each, the lack of funding threatens to undermine this progress and further delay and/or disruption women entrepreneurs and their business plans, which could have long-term implications for their success.

by Dayne Hodgson

Shaping the tenth framework programme (FP10)

Member States Advocate for Greater Influence in Shaping FP10

The tenth framework programme (FP10) for research and innovation in the European Union is garnering significant attention from member states who are calling for a more prominent role in its strategic planning. This development follows the adoption of a new opinion paper by a special task force of the European Research Area and Innovation Committee (ERAC). The paper emphasises the need for a stable and predictable funding framework and the inclusion of Collaborative Research Actions to support basic research.

A Call for Enhanced Strategic Involvement

The task force's recommendations reflect a broader desire among EU governments to have a more substantial say in setting the priorities for FP10. This includes making strategic choices that align with national and regional research goals, thereby leveraging national, regional, and private investments more effectively. The opinion suggests that a more consultative approach involving member states and stakeholders could enhance the programme's relevance and impact.

Addressing the Funding Issue

While the opinion paper does not specify a budget, it highlights the importance of a stable financial framework for research and innovation. This is crucial to ensure the success of FP10 and maintain its competitive edge globally. However, the absence of specific budget recommendations has drawn criticism from various quarters. Kamila Kozirog of the European University Association (EUA) and Mattias Björnmalm of CESAER highlighted the missed opportunity to advocate for increased funding. Both stress the necessity of achieving the 3% GDP target for research and innovation, with a public effort of 1.25%.

Simplification and Inclusivity in Funding Mechanisms

The task force advocates for simplifying the structure of Pillar II, which currently includes calls for Research and Innovation Actions and Innovation Actions for higher Technology Readiness Levels. By adding Research Actions, FP10 could make it clearer that Pillar II is also dedicated to research, not just innovation-focused projects. This aligns with calls from the League of European Research Universities (LERU) for more simplification in grant applications.

Additionally, the task force recommends evaluations of the Widening measures aimed at closing the east-west gap in research capabilities, and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). The opinion also suggests phasing out instruments that are no longer relevant, though it does not specify which ones.

Positive Views and Constructive Criticism

The European Research Council (ERC) and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) receive positive mentions for their roles in supporting career development and breakthrough research. The European Innovation Council (EIC) is also praised for addressing gaps between research excellence and market transformation. However, there is a recommendation to move "Missions" out of FP10, as their objectives extend beyond the programme’s scope.

Stakeholder and SME Involvement

The task force stresses the importance of involving stakeholder organisations in the planning and oversight of FP10. While this move is supported by many, including EUA and CESAER, concerns remain about the potential for increased member state involvement to slow down priority setting. Moreover, acknowledging the critical role of SMEs, the task force suggests exploring the possibility of lowering their financial contributions in certain partnerships.

Beyond EU Borders

A continent-wide approach and faster association processes for neighbouring countries sharing EU values are prioritised to bolster European research and innovation. This includes swift associations with countries like Switzerland to leverage the full research and innovation capacity of Europe.

Towards a Single Market for Knowledge

The opinion supports the concept of a "single market for knowledge" and the idea of research and innovation as a "fifth freedom," enabling the free movement of research, innovation, knowledge, and education. This vision, proposed by former Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta, aims to position Europe as a global leader in research and innovation.

Conclusion

The call for a more strategic role in shaping FP10 highlights the evolving landscape of European research and innovation policy. By addressing funding stability, simplifying mechanisms, and enhancing stakeholder involvement, FP10 aims to build on the successes of its predecessors while adapting to new challenges. The collaborative approach and strategic investments envisaged in FP10 could pave the way for ground breaking advancements and sustained economic growth in the EU.

by Dayne Hodgson

EU's AI Strategy Falls Short

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has issued a critical report on the European Commission's (EC) strategy for artificial intelligence (AI), highlighting significant shortfalls. The report reveals that the EU underspent on AI by €600 million due to delays in the 2021 launch of Horizon Europe.

Key Failings Identified

The ECA's audit identifies several key issues that have hindered the EU's AI strategy:

  • Lack of Post-Project Checks: There were insufficient mechanisms to monitor projects after their completion.
  • Fragmented Management: A disorganised array of departments and agencies were responsible for AI policy, leading to inefficiencies.
  • Inadequate Performance Indicators: The EC lacked an accurate overview of funded AI projects, impeding effective monitoring and evaluation.

Mihails Kozlovs, the ECA member who led the review, emphasised the need for the EC to enhance its focus on delivering results. "More than five years after adopting the EU AI plan, weaknesses in implementation and performance monitoring are still evident," he stated at a press conference.

EU Commission's Defence

In response, the EC defended its record, rejecting many of the ECA's proposals. The EC highlighted the establishment of the European AI Office, which aims to enforce the new AI Act and bolster support schemes. Despite these advancements, the ECA's findings come at a crucial time, as the EU continues to trail the US and China in AI development, particularly in patents and private investment.

Comparative Investment Figures

According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the US led in AI venture capital funding in 2023 with €55 billion, followed by China with €18 billion, and the EU with just €8 billion - a significant drop from 2022.

Historical Context and Strategy Implementation

The audit traces back to 2018 when European governments began releasing ambitious AI plans. The EC’s strategy included significant investments through the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe programs. While nearly meeting its spending targets for 2018-2020, the EC fell short by €600 million for the 2021-22 period due to delays in Horizon Europe's adoption.

Expert Opinions

Robert Praas, an AI specialist at the CEPS think tank, deemed the audit an "accurate assessment" of the EU's slow progress in AI innovation. He attributed this to a gap between political ambition and implementation capability, suggesting that the EU's regulatory focus hindered its innovation potential.

Coordination and Fragmentation Issues

The ECA pointed out the absence of a central coordinating body for AI projects, leading to overlapping and fragmented efforts. For instance, three different AI taxonomy projects were funded by various EU bodies without coordination, exemplifying the management inefficiencies.

Performance and Exploitation Challenges

The audit highlighted that while Horizon projects were monitored during their lifetime, post-completion checks were lacking. In many cases, research did not translate into commercial applications. A cybersecurity project on autonomous cars, for instance, failed to commercialise despite an extensive 117-page exploitation plan.

Furthermore, the audit found that per €10 million spent on AI in Horizon 2020, only 0.65 patents were applied for, well below targets.

EC’s Response to Recommendations

The EC agreed to update its AI investment targets considering the rise of generative AI but rejected the ECA's calls for a new framework for tagging and tracking AI financial support, citing cost and burden concerns. It also dismissed the need for AI-specific performance targets, arguing that existing indicators under Horizon Europe and Digital Europe were sufficient given the fast-evolving nature of AI technologies.

The ECA’s report highlights the need for improved coordination, monitoring, and strategic focus if the EU is to enhance its competitive standing in the global AI landscape.

by Dayne Hodgson

Wales Technology Awards 2024 Winners Announced

Technology Connected recently played host to the eagerly awaited Wales Technology Awards 2024, in collaboration with Headline Partner de Novo Solutions. The grand gala served as a platform to spotlight the remarkable accomplishments and ground-breaking innovations within Wales' thriving tech sector.

Hosted by BBC Wales news anchor Jennifer Jones, the Awards ceremony drew together 300 luminaries from across the Welsh technology landscape, including industry titans, representatives from the public and private sectors, and avid supporters. It served as a tribute to the significant contributions of the Welsh tech industry, showcasing its pivotal role in shaping communication, business practices, and global engagement.

One of the evening's standout moments was the presentation of the prestigious 'The Sir Michael Moritz Tech Start-up Award', shining a spotlight on the exceptional start-ups in Wales driving innovation in cutting-edge technologies. In collaboration with Hexa Finance, this coveted accolade was clinched by Optimise-AI, marking a testament to their creativity and ingenuity.

The distinguished winners of the Wales Technology Awards 2024 included:

Welsh Secretary David TC Davies, the Guest of Honour, lauded the event, highlighting the crucial role of the tech sector in the Welsh economy and extending congratulations to the winners.

The Wales Technology Awards 2024 received generous support from esteemed industry organisations and stakeholders, including Headline Partner de Novo Solutions, Hexa Finance, Box UK, Deloitte, Wynne-Jones IP, HCR Law, CSA Catapult, Venture Graduates, and Cardiff Capital Region, BusinessNewsWales, NCL and RedKnight.

Avril Lewis, Managing Director at Technology Connected, praised the event's success, highlighting the pivotal role of Welsh technology in driving societal progress and combating global challenges. She reiterated Technology Connected's commitment to advancing Wales' tech industry and fostering innovation on the global stage.

RedKnight would like to congratulate the Technology Connected team for what was a fantastic evening of celebration. We are already looking forward to seeing what the Class of 2025 will have in store for us next year.

by Dayne Hodgson

New release of EU Funding & Tenders Portal launched

The European Commission (EC) recently announced the launch of the latest iteration of the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, marking a significant milestone in its journey to enhance user experience. Drawing on the invaluable feedback from a diverse community of over 1.5 million users, which includes EU funding applicants, beneficiaries, tenderers, and experts, the EC has worked to implement improvements that cater to user needs and preferences.

This new release introduces a range of enhancements aimed at providing users with a more intuitive and immersive experience. Among the notable updates are refreshed interfaces across the Portal, with the homepage now prominently showcasing the EC's core services and functionalities. Powered by state-of-the-art technology, the funding page search engine has been revamped to deliver more precise and relevant results, ensuring users can easily discover funding opportunities that align with their interests and objectives.

For logged-in users, the EC has introduced affinity-based recommendations of 'calls for proposals,' tailored to their specific profile and preferences. This personalised approach ensures that users never miss out on relevant opportunities that could take their project forward. Additionally, to further streamline navigation, the EC has integrated a global search feature at the top right corner of the Portal, allowing users to quickly access the information with ease.

The EC’s commitment to continuous improvement means it is constantly striving to enhance user experience on the EU Funding & Tenders Portal. To provide a comprehensive overview of all the latest updates and novelties, interested stakeholders are invited to watch a 3 minute informative video, which highlights the key enhancements and previews what's to come in the future.

by Dayne Hodgson